loader image

Harmony Analytics

Understanding the Role of Carbon Offsets in Achieving Net Zero Goals

Carbon offsets are a tool in the journey towards net zero emissions, but their use is complex and widely debated. Here’s an overview of their current role and how they integrate into broader climate strategies.

There’s growing scrutiny over the use of carbon offsets in net zero claims. Some critics argue that relying on offsets may allow companies to avoid making direct emission reductions.

The effectiveness of carbon offsets heavily depends on their quality. High-quality offsets, certified by standards like the Gold Standard or the Verified Carbon Standard, ensure actual climate benefits. These projects must be additional (lead to emission reductions that would not have occurred otherwise), permanent, verifiable, and free from double counting.

Companies are advised to use carbon offsets for hard-to-eliminate residual emissions, complementing direct emission reduction efforts rather than replacing them.

The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market (ICVCM) is addressing concerns about the integrity of carbon offsets. Recent assessments showed that about a third of carbon credits did not meet new standards, particularly those linked to renewable energy projects, due to issues with proving additionality.

The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) continues to debate the role of carbon credits in meeting net-zero targets. Currently, SBTi requires that carbon credits be reported separately and not counted as reductions towards near-term or long-term targets, with the exception of neutralizing residual emissions.

Companies are increasingly measuring and disclosing emissions across all scopes (Scope 1, 2, and 3) to fully understand and manage their carbon footprint.

Many are setting both absolute and intensity-based targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across their operations and value chains.

Efforts include enhancing energy efficiency and shifting to renewable energy sources such as solar and wind.

Companies are also focusing on emissions from their value chains by working with suppliers to set and achieve emission reduction targets.

While the primary goal is to reduce emissions, investments in nature-based solutions and carbon capture technologies are being made to offset remaining emissions.


Harmony Analytics and Your Business

As these new standards evolve, staying informed and adaptable is crucial. Harmony Analytics ensures a standardized reporting process by consistently evaluating over 11,000 companies, quantifying emissions, and tracking progress toward net-zero targets. Our platform enables users to benchmark a company’s profile against its peers, identifying risks and opportunities for development.

    plugins premium WordPress

    European Union

    European Union

    2019 – Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (Sustainability)
    2021 – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 (European Climate Law)
    2021 – Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 SFDR
    2022 – Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (EU Taxonomy)
    2024 – Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)
    2024 – European Green Deal
    2024 – Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)

    2020 – Guide on climate-related and environmental risks (Voluntary)

    2019 – ESMA Guidelines on Disclosure Requirements Applicable to Credit Ratings (Voluntary)

    United States of America

    Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

    2022 – The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors

    2022 – Public Company Cybersecurity
    2022 – Pay versus Performance
    2024 – US SEC Climate Guidance

    2012 – The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act

    2018 – SB 826 Corporate Board and Gender Diversity (Voluntary)
    2023 – SB 253 and SB 261: California Climate Disclosure Rules

    2021 – NASDAQ’S BOARD DIVERSITY RULE

    2024 – New York’s SB S897C and SB 5437-  climate-related financial disclosure (proposed)

    2024 -Washington’s SB 6092 Environment, Energy & Technology disclosure (proposed)

    2024 – Illinois’ HB 4268 (proposed)

    2024 – Minnesota’s SF 2744 (proposed)

    1972 – Clean Water Act

    1966 – Civil Rights Act of 1964 (EEO 1 Component 1 report)